Skip to content
CryptoSocialsAgent access

CRYPTO RESEARCH · YOUR QUESTIONS

Explore with your agent

Ask about live Crypto X discussion, an author's history, a coin's changing story, or the posts around a price move. Combine people, assets, topics and dates, then follow up on what you find. Explore the ideas below or start with your own question.

Connect your agent →

Where would you like to start?

CryptoSocials supplies the posts, identities, dates, source links and stored price observations. Your agent reads that evidence, makes comparisons and explains its findings. The answer can be a quick catch-up or a deeper investigation, depending on your question.

Follow the discussionSee which coins people are discussing now and how attention is changing.

Try a question

  • Which coins gained discussion today compared with yesterday?
  • Is attention around $BTC spreading to more authors, or coming from the same few accounts?
  • What are people actually saying about the five most discussed coins?
  • Which previously quiet assets have new discussion this week?

Take it further

  • Compare equal time windows by post count and distinct authors.
  • Separate original commentary from repost activity, then read representative posts.
  • Break a period into days or weeks, or narrow it to selected authors and assets.
  • Follow a ranking into a coin's posts, author claims and price timeline.

Evidence available Whole-window counts, dated posts, author identities, source links and available engagement observations.

These are collected-post counts, not all of X. Popularity is not sentiment or prediction quality. Live summaries show a limited leading set; use aggregation for larger rankings.

Understand a coin's storyFollow a coin across posts, people and time, with its exact identity attached.

Try a question

  • What changed in the discussion around $SUI this week?
  • What arguments are people making for and against $ETH?
  • Who introduced a new thesis about this token, and who challenged it?
  • Compare discussion of these two tokens before and after their announcements.

Take it further

  • Start from a ticker, name or known contract and confirm the intended coin.
  • Read a balanced selection across the period rather than only the latest posts.
  • Trace a claim through replies, quotes and later commentary where retained.
  • Compare discussion with the coin's stored price timeline.

Evidence available Asset identities, matched posts, full-window activity, referenced posts and available price sources.

A shared ticker can name several coins. Candidate matches stay explicit; a matching name alone is not identity proof.

Research the people behind the postsLook beyond one successful call: inspect an author's claims, changes of view and track record in context.

Try a question

  • What has @CryptoKaleo been saying about $ETH, and has his view changed?
  • Compare these three authors' arguments about $BTC this month.
  • Was this an early, specific prediction or a comment after most of the move?
  • Does this author focus on a few coins or make frequent predictions across many?
  • Find examples that support and challenge this author's thesis.
  • Which posts attracted lasting engagement, rather than just a recent spike?

Take it further

  • Inspect the actual wording, date, entry conditions, targets and invalidations.
  • Compare an author's earlier and later views on the same asset.
  • Check other calls and misses before judging a selected success.
  • Look at posting breadth, frequency and dated audience/engagement observations.
  • Choose a relevant cohort, explain your comparison criteria and follow promising examples into their sources.

Evidence available Stored author profiles and handles, post bodies, whole-window counts, engagement checkpoints and price observations.

The agent assesses the evidence; CryptoSocials does not assign a success score. A sampled comparison is not an exhaustive ranking of every author, and an old profile snapshot is not a current follower count.

Connect posts with price historyInvestigate what was said before, during and after a move.

Try a question

  • Who discussed $SUI before it crossed $1, and what exactly did they say?
  • Did the price support the bullish commentary about $SOL that day?
  • What warnings appeared before this selloff?
  • How far was the price from an author's target when they posted, and what happened on the way there?
  • Were people already talking about the event, or did the explanation appear afterward?

Take it further

  • Inspect the timeline before choosing the relevant discussion window.
  • Compare specific claims with later observations, including intervening adverse moves.
  • Separate conditions and proposed entries from claims that a trade actually happened.
  • Investigate conflicting explanations and counterexamples.

Evidence available Original post times, selected stored price sources, raw points or available candles, source links and observation dates.

Post time, price-effective time and capture time are different. Gaps stay visible. Nearby observations are not exact trade prices, and sequence alone does not prove a post caused a move.

Explore connected assetsNarrow research by stored chain associations and compare the assets within them.

Try a question

  • Which tokens associated with Solana were discussed most this week?
  • What are authors saying about assets linked to Base?
  • Which multichain assets appear in both of these research scopes?
  • Compare native assets with tokens associated with the same chain.

Take it further

  • Filter by a known chain, native/token relationship or multichain status.
  • Rank associated assets, then investigate selected coins and their actual posts.
  • Combine chain filters with authors, dates or text topics.
  • Inspect the identity details when an association is surprising.

Evidence available Confirmed stored asset-chain associations, asset identities, readable posts and activity counts.

Association with a chain does not mean native to it. The same asset can occur in several chain scopes; a matching post is not necessarily about that chain. Category filters such as meme coins are not provided.

Catch up on what you followUse your saved Lists to give research a personal starting point.

Try a question

  • What did I miss around the coins and authors on my List?
  • Which of my followed authors changed their view this week?
  • Pick the original posts worth reading from my List today, and explain why.
  • Compare this week's discussion with last week's for the coins I follow.

Take it further

  • Choose a saved List and a period, or name the interests directly.
  • Read new discussion matching the List's assets or authors without duplicate posts.
  • Inspect related prices, original claims or conflicting views when useful.
  • Follow up on one finding without repeating the entire catch-up.

Evidence available Your connected account's List names and members, matching posts, saved references and source links.

Only your connected account's Lists are available. These read tools do not edit Lists, mark posts seen or create alerts. Website controls manage those actions.

Trace a topic through timeExplore how a narrative developed and compare what different people said.

Try a question

  • How did the discussion of this announcement change over the following week?
  • Who disagreed with this thesis, and what evidence did they give?
  • Was this quote shared as agreement, criticism or just amplification?
  • Compare the claims in these two periods and show the original sources.

Take it further

  • Combine text, exact assets, authors and dates.
  • Follow retained reply, quote and repost relationships.
  • Compare periods and examine changes in both discussion volume and content.
  • Read engagement history using its observation dates, not just a present-looking total.

Evidence available Searchable retained text, post relationships, provenance, publication dates and engagement checkpoints.

A repost is not an independent opinion, and a quote does not establish agreement. Retained text and relationships may be incomplete; absence from the archive is not proof nobody said it.

Understand coverage and creditsCheck what evidence is available and choose a useful research scope.

Try a question

  • How much research can I do with my remaining credits?
  • What evidence do you have for this coin and period?
  • Start with a small investigation, then tell me what a deeper pass would add.
  • Can you answer this from the posts we already retrieved?

Take it further

  • Check the actual shared balance without spending research credits.
  • Use existing results and source details before making duplicate requests.
  • Agree a bounded investigation when a broad question could require many pages.
  • Distinguish an empty result, missing history and a failed request.

Evidence available Account allowance and operation costs, requested-window counts, price-source availability and explicit gaps.

One credit currently pays for each successful data request, including empty results. Each extra page is another request. Failed requests, connection/capability help and balance reads are free.

ABOUT THE DATA

The evidence behind the answer

Selected Crypto X posts, linked to identified assets and dated price history, with original sources you can inspect.

Selected sources

Collection follows selected Crypto X accounts, with source checks that exclude unavailable, protected, suspended and blocked accounts from the active set. Quotes and reposts can also preserve material from other authors. Source identities and post relationships remain attached so you and your agent can examine who said what.

Coin identities, not just tickers

Posts are linked to specific assets using the identity evidence available. That matters when several coins share a symbol. Unresolved or ambiguous matches remain explicit, so an uncertain mention does not quietly become a confident coin match.

Prices with dates and provenance

Stored price observations and available candles can be read alongside posts. Source, effective time and capture time stay attached. That lets your agent compare a claim with what was observed afterward without pretending every post has an exact trade-time price.

Live discussion and retained history

Collection adds new evidence continuously while retaining earlier posts and price observations. Ask your agent for a recent window or look back at a past period. Freshness and history differ by source and asset; your agent can inspect the coverage relevant to your question.

Sources you can check

Research returns source links, identities and retained text. Available reply, quote and repost relationships help distinguish an original claim from a later share. Your agent interprets this evidence and cites what supports its answer.

A clear idea of the cost

One research credit pays for one successful request for data. A question can combine several requests: finding an author, reading their posts, then checking prices. MCP, REST and website Archive research share your account balance; website Live browsing is free.

A daily discussion ranking

One request for ranked coin counts across a selected day.

1 credit

An author's first research pass

Find the author, then read their profile, first page of posts and period totals.

2 credits

Posts alongside a price timeline

The recorded $SOL example used an asset lookup, posts, price-source discovery, price history and a batch of selected full posts.

5 credits

Measured operator investigations on 24 September 2026. These are examples of specific scopes, not fixed prices per answer. More authors, periods, sources or pages can require more requests; reusing results can require fewer.

Connection help, this guide, balance checks and failed requests cost no research credits.

Plans and credit allowances →